eDominations

The Economist

Subscribe and be first to read one of the most usefull news in eDominations! Prijavi se Registriraj se

[suggestion to Admins] Adding weapons in battles | Tweet

Objavljen v Slovenia - Vojaške analize - 45 - 24 Jul 18 08:56

Hello, it is some time now since admins implemented option to add weapons into battles. This option has been used very well in my country and people like it very much. Lets se how this looks like when you get to battle page. You get small arow which is expandable when pressed.

ï»¿
And after expanding it you get a small window:

ï»¿

Our president added 8000 Q1 weapons in battle to use them. 2717 are already used alltogether of added 8000.

BUT I HAVE SOME SUGGESTIONS FOR ADMINS TO MAKE THIS OPTION EVEN BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!

All ideas are supported with arguments.

I know someone else most probably suggested all that things but was then forgotten. I do not want to steal ideas, i just want to see them supported and perhaps implemented thats why im pointing them out again.

1. Only country president has option to add weapons into battles. I suggest that this option be added also for MoD (Minister of defence) as well.Â He is first man in government responsible to work with weapon supplies and directly responsible for war acts! Besides, if one is absent, always another one of these 2 can put weapons in battles.

2. Now weapons can be added only once per battle. This is bad, since many times we can not expect how many weapons we will need. Battle might get tense in the end when supplies are already used! I would like to add more supplies at that time! Please, add option to add weapons in battle more than 1 time!

3. Only one quality of weapons can be sent into battle at time. I suggest add option to add AT LEAST 2 of the qualities simuntaneously into battle! This way, we can add low Q weapons like Q1 or Q2 for a bit poorer players and on the other side Q4 or Q5 weapons for wealthy players who do not want to shoot with low Q. I feel responsible as MoD of country to provide weapons for all my citizens acordingly. This option would make me less work and better gameplay!

4. Price for weapons can only be set in GOLD. Please add option to choose (when adding into battle) whether people will buy weaponsÂ with gold or CC. This would BOOST LOCAL MARKETS and make turnus of gold/cc more efficient in country!

5. eevilking mentioned that there could be option to limit how many pieces one person can get. That would be very usefull so every citizen gets option to use some if he is late. Otherwise 1 wealthy player can use all himself.

Vote if you like ideas, subscribe if you want to read more, support if you agree!

Podpri

keyser TheFallenCastiel tryd0 Elon Musk Franky Four Fingers Safed ErnestoGuevara Polar B3ar Kaveh CelioMG Captain Price DreSanu Janez Grozni KamiNutsy BlackPudding WhitePudding

Komentarji (45)

24 Jul 18 09:06

El Gran COLPHO

5. Make it possible to add wps in Allies wats. 6. Make it possible to add wps for Allied to use in pie own wars

24 Jul 18 09:13

zebosk

most exploited system by multies xd ask peruvians xd hope admins/mods system to check the transactions in this module is working well xd

24 Jul 18 09:14

keyser

@COLPHO... Your idea was already on the plate (my idea fight after the intro of the weps in the battles) and it will be realized soon I hopeðŸ’ªðŸ»

24 Jul 18 09:31

Franky Four Fingers

7. Make limit for Military Rank. f.ex. q5 weaps visible only for SF rank and higher, lower q weaps for weaker players.

24 Jul 18 10:23

1224333

is there a button there? lol, how long since? hardly visible !!!

24 Jul 18 11:16

Bikkin

Good ideas! In fact, remove gold from Supplies altogether. Payments should be done strictly in currency for those weapons.

24 Jul 18 12:11

kosmatka

We can all agree this feature needs some work. @Macola good suggestions I also like your idea @Franky

24 Jul 18 13:16

Judy Alvarez

Big support, good ideas!

24 Jul 18 22:51

FANTE

Also add strength limit to buy weapons

25 Jul 18 12:56

Bilbo Baggins

Great idea which I gladly support. Also very well explained with good arguments.

25 Jul 18 20:20

Santiago Orquera

Like this !

25 Jul 18 23:05

gapogape

Good idea.

25 Jul 18 23:24

Pew Pew

Good idea all of it! :)

26 Jul 18 01:56

El Coloro

anyone should be able to add weapons as co in some battle

26 Jul 18 05:29

ErnestoGuevara

Good Idea

20 Sep 18 13:50

Polar B3ar

ðŸ‘

20 Sep 18 13:50

enigma the one

Wholeheartedly agree with these ideas.

20 Sep 18 13:53

Eddie the Lama

I am commenting just cause Macolar asked me. D:

20 Sep 18 13:54

harli99

Good i like it :)

20 Sep 18 13:54

Kaveh

good ideas every good change in game must be supported o7

20 Sep 18 13:57

Manduco

Yes good ideas, support

20 Sep 18 13:57

smajli

Great ideas!

20 Sep 18 14:00

Better look around

I support all of the mentioned ideas

20 Sep 18 14:02

Salamander Man

cry

20 Sep 18 14:06

Captain Price

Good Idea vote! o7

20 Sep 18 14:06

Liberator

Good idea

20 Sep 18 14:09

DreSanu

Even if many of those were proposed already under one way or the other, they are still good ideas but there is just a little problem. Nobody (from admins side) cares. When this was suggested long ago they said we might change it, we might listen to players suggestions regarding this module and improve it. Already about 2-3 months passed since then ,if not more, and not a thing changed. And on the top of that, now they playing dead with us for many days. So gl for them reading this ;D

20 Sep 18 14:18

Still Standing

Supported o/ .. Like zebosk said... This is probably the most exploited system by multies... hope admins/mods add a way to check the transactions in this module.

20 Sep 18 14:28

Manolis Papas

Nice ideas I support them.

20 Sep 18 14:40

AislinnAFK

YES. Those improvements are useful, especially now, when buying from CP low quality weaps for 10% of its value can be considered as boosting. So we would like to see f.ex. q1 and q5 supply at same time. First one for strong players and second would be perfect for weaker players.Possible limit for one player is ok too.